

Moderators: ajaxusa, Kowalczyk, mods
de Zeeuw had a very good game -- we are lucky to have him. As to the game itself -- some people have looked at the score and concluded we had a good win. IMO nothing could be farther from the truth. Defense was crap -- passing was crap -- it was only after they were down to 10 men that we were able to take charge of the game. Up to then, we were lucky we were facing a team of the quality of Waalwijk and not anyone even a little better. IMO we really need two quality defenders and a strong forward (and lots of work on the passing) if we hope to win the title this year.philippe schreef:How did de Zeeuw play ?
I think Mickey and Suarez pair working just fine in front (4 goals in two matches). Plus we have Cvitanich on the bench. If we buy another striker, who's place he will take? Not Suarez, that's for sure. Mickey? I personally want to see him playing. So like i said, i'm comfortable with our offensive power, defence is the one who worries me.rjf1 schreef:de Zeeuw had a very good game -- we are lucky to have him. As to the game itself -- some people have looked at the score and concluded we had a good win. IMO nothing could be farther from the truth. Defense was crap -- passing was crap -- it was only after they were down to 10 men that we were able to take charge of the game. Up to then, we were lucky we were facing a team of the quality of Waalwijk and not anyone even a little better. IMO we really need two quality defenders and a strong forward (and lots of work on the passing) if we hope to win the title this year.philippe schreef:How did de Zeeuw play ?