I think you're right for this specific moment in time, and I surely don't want to diss Scottish football, but I do think the Dutch clubs are normally on a slightly higher level. Holland have (and always have had) a considerably higher score on the UEFA ranking than Scotland. Which means - no matter how you look at it - that Dutch clubs perform better in 'Europe' than Scottish clubs over all (and I'm not talking about the 'golden seventies' here, as the UEFA ranking is based on the past five seasons).dws schreef:Rangers, Celtic and Hearts are of a similar standard to the top four in Eredivisie; Hibs could be compared to Utrecht and Groningen.
Celtic's shock win over Ajax in 2001 was more or less the exception that proved the rule. In recent seasons AZ beat Rangers and Feyenoord beat Hearts. In both cases the final score looked quite 'ordinary' (1-0 and 2-0, respectively), but the difference in skill and over-all quality was quite big, I must say. Rangers and Hearts were thoroughly outplayed and could have lost by a very big score.
I think the Scottish league could be compared to the Belgian league, for example. If the 'A category' is England, Italy, Spain, Germany and France, Holland would be in the 'B category' (with Portugal and Greece, I guess) and Scotland would be in the 'C category' with Belgium, Turkey and a few others. I don't see how that observation could be unfair, as it corresponds with the UEFA ranking.
K.