05 Feb 2006: Feyenoord - Ajax
Moderators: ajaxusa, Kowalczyk, mods
- English Eagle
- Berichten: 140
- Lid geworden op: ma aug 29, 2005 10:41 am
- Locatie: Basingstoke, England
- john_stein
- Berichten: 32
- Lid geworden op: di mar 08, 2005 9:57 pm
-
- Berichten: 448
- Lid geworden op: vr nov 07, 2003 11:03 am
- Locatie: Nantwich
- Contacteer:
- ZoefdeHaas
- Berichten: 1440
- Lid geworden op: ma mei 09, 2005 10:47 am
I think it's very hard on Charisteas to drop him, escpecially when he's on form. This is exactly the type of match he'd be good for.
4-4-2 with Huntelaar and Charisteas up front and Juanfran in left midfield is what I'd have gone for.
Rosales isn't the type of player who is going to get you points in De Kuip.
4-4-2 with Huntelaar and Charisteas up front and Juanfran in left midfield is what I'd have gone for.
Rosales isn't the type of player who is going to get you points in De Kuip.
- bluedaddy19
- Berichten: 1210
- Lid geworden op: do apr 07, 2005 6:57 pm
- Locatie: mokum
- Contacteer:
oh no... don't you remember? our best center back has to play right back because we only have 15 players left and 6 of them are strikerssouras84 schreef:Once again the usual issue is on. To win trophies u got to have a good defence, which we dont.
life fucking sucks
AJAX HUP ROOD WITTE SCHARE, DAPP RE STRIJDERS FIER EN KOEN
GEEN CLUB DIE ONS KAN EVENAREN, ROOD EN WIT WORDT KAMPIOEN
GEEN CLUB DIE ONS KAN EVENAREN, ROOD EN WIT WORDT KAMPIOEN
Just a few spontaneous comments:
In a normal team with a a defence of decent class, one goal by Rosenberg and one goal by Huntelaar should be enough for at least one point. What happens here is that we are prevented from scoring even more goals by our poor defence, because when they score they can cover their defence so that it will become harder for us to score.
In the recent games it has also become clear that our midfield does not posses the techniques, skill and creativity. It is not Ajax midfielders, Ajax midfielders should be entertaining. Now when we have Huntelaar it is obvious that the attackers are not the main problem.
One good thing is that Rosenberg continues his trend, goal for the fourth game in a row, 8 goals in the ten latest i think. Today it was in vain and that is a shame. Keep it up Markus, at least you does not let us down! :xyxthumbs: Not a brilliant game, but quite good and a goal is always a goal.
Out with Rosales, please!
And out with the whole defence!
In a normal team with a a defence of decent class, one goal by Rosenberg and one goal by Huntelaar should be enough for at least one point. What happens here is that we are prevented from scoring even more goals by our poor defence, because when they score they can cover their defence so that it will become harder for us to score.
In the recent games it has also become clear that our midfield does not posses the techniques, skill and creativity. It is not Ajax midfielders, Ajax midfielders should be entertaining. Now when we have Huntelaar it is obvious that the attackers are not the main problem.
One good thing is that Rosenberg continues his trend, goal for the fourth game in a row, 8 goals in the ten latest i think. Today it was in vain and that is a shame. Keep it up Markus, at least you does not let us down! :xyxthumbs: Not a brilliant game, but quite good and a goal is always a goal.
Out with Rosales, please!
And out with the whole defence!
I beg to differ, our best centre back was playing on the right. Pay respect where it's due. Now, our second best center back is in Seville, the one that used to compose a GREAT duo with Grygera. The one that was part of the team that used to play decent football and did not give 2.5 goals to the opponent on average.bryan schreef:our best centre back is on holiday in sevilleour best center back has to play right back because we only have 15 players left and 6 of them are strikers
Now I'd like really like to know what Escudé did (assaulting Jaake in the locker? Insulting Blind and his wife? Raped Rita Verdonk?) that was so bad.... Seriously. We could have bought a decent right back and had a defence like that :
Juanfran (with Emmanuelson in left midfield) - Escudé - Grygera - Said purchased good right back. That would have been awesome.
We're the shit, and you know we're thheeeee shit, and you know we're the shit, and you know we're the...
(Known melody, sing over and over).
I can't wait to come over to Amsterdam and have a bad time... not.
Go Blind !! #rolls eyes#
meh :|
Did I see Sneijder signalling to the bench for a substitution in about the 55th minute? What the hell is that all about? It had better not have been an "I'm taking my bat and my ball and going home..."john_stein schreef:great change, bring Sarpong in. Bring the 17 year against Feyenoord when we are loosing 3-1 to replace Sneijder and make his debut. oh and keep Babel on the bench...way to go fu`^*ing stupid Blind way to go.
Oh, we were shit by the way. Bertrand, I think you've got a few stray definite articles in your "known melody".
-
- Berichten: 448
- Lid geworden op: vr nov 07, 2003 11:03 am
- Locatie: Nantwich
- Contacteer:
Way to completely miss the point Purple :)The Purple Cow schreef:That would be a bit rough on the striker that's scored eight times in the last ten games, Bryan.bryan schreef: 4-4-2 with Huntelaar and Charisteas up front and Juanfran in left midfield is what I'd have gone for.
No matter how much we score, since we developped a recent habit of giving one more to the opponent :xyxthumbs:
meh :|
You want to drop the player that scores in every game (Rosenberg)? :nooo: Does not make sense, if we should play 4-4-2 (which I doubt will be the case) we should have on strong target player and one high speed player running a lot. This worked well when Rosenberg and Charisteas played together, when we dropped this combination everything really started to go down the drain.bryan schreef:I think it's very hard on Charisteas to drop him, escpecially when he's on form. This is exactly the type of match he'd be good for.
4-4-2 with Huntelaar and Charisteas up front and Juanfran in left midfield is what I'd have gone for.
Rosales isn't the type of player who is going to get you points in De Kuip.
For the moment I believe Charisteas might be better than Huntelaar. Huntlelaar is good, but quite some of his greatness can be traced back to his team mates in Heerenven.
Of course, if I was managing Ajax, we wouldn't have bought extra strikers in the first place!The Purple Cow schreef:That would be a bit rough on the striker that's scored eight times in the last ten games, Bryan.bryan schreef: 4-4-2 with Huntelaar and Charisteas up front and Juanfran in left midfield is what I'd have gone for.
I Agree, If we play 4-2-2 Huntelaar is not needed, in 4-3-3 it is still hard to say what he can do, but obviously we does not have a team for 4-3-3 for the moment, so a striker more was the wrong priority. It is the naked stinking truth.bryan schreef:Of course, if I was managing Ajax, we wouldn't have bought extra strikers in the first place!The Purple Cow schreef:That would be a bit rough on the striker that's scored eight times in the last ten games, Bryan.bryan schreef: 4-4-2 with Huntelaar and Charisteas up front and Juanfran in left midfield is what I'd have gone for.
What I mean is that Harry and Rosenberg could have saved the season in 4-4-2. It would not have been a season of glamour but at least we would have won the games we lose now and we would have had money to buy a midfield and especially a defence to be proud of. Players capable of playing the system we are proud of.kaiser schreef:I Agree, If we play 4-2-2 Huntelaar is not needed, in 4-3-3 it is still hard to say what he can do, but obviously we does not have a team for 4-3-3 for the moment, so a striker more was the wrong priority. It is the naked stinking truth.bryan schreef:Of course, if I was managing Ajax, we wouldn't have bought extra strikers in the first place!The Purple Cow schreef: That would be a bit rough on the striker that's scored eight times in the last ten games, Bryan.